The 50 Richest Members of Congress
Roll Call Staff
Related Content
Guide to Congress
- Chart: Members and Their Money
- Record Mixed on Democrats Follow Through
- Republicans Look to Bench for Rising Stars
- Departing Members Plot Their Next Career Moves
- Democrats Dream About a 60-Vote Majority
- Speaker Adjusts Power-Sharing Relationships
- The Roll Call Fabulous Fifty
- Lobbyists Gear Up to Play Defense in 2009
- The 50 Richest Members of Congress
- Video: How the 50 Richest Are Determined
Clarification Appended
Everything that you are about to read might be wrong.
Roll Calls annual attempt to rank the riches of Members of Congress is hampered by one fundamental flaw: It is based on the lawmakers financial disclosure forms, which are extraordinarily unreliable sources of information.
The disclosure rules allow Members to report assets in broad categories, so there is no way to tell the difference between a $20 million investment and a $5 million investment. The top category on the Members forms is over $50 million, so it is impossible to accurately account for anything worth more than that like a professional sports team, for example. There is also a gaping loophole for assets owned by the Members spouse or dependent children; anything worth more than $1 million in value can be reported as over $1 million. There is no way to tell whether that is $1.2 million or $1.2 billion.
The rules also dont require reporting things of value that are not used to produce income most notably any primary residence or other home that is not used for rentals. That loophole removes from most Members portfolios hundreds of thousands of dollars and in come cases millions of dollars worth of assets. Airplanes, fancy cars, antiques or other valuable items are not reported.
In filing a detailed disclosure form on behalf of Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), his accountants added this editorial note, which sums up the problem: The form is meant to comply with Senate disclosure rules but is not intended to be a complete presentation of Senator Corkers financial position.
Beyond all of these flaws, there remains the fact that many, many financial disclosure forms filed by Members of Congress are simply inaccurate. A check mark placed in the wrong box can inflate or deflate a Members apparent net worth by millions of dollars, and misunderstandings of the rules have led Members to understate some assets, overstate others and claim additional assets they no longer own.
Where the errors are obvious or have created noticeable discrepancies from prior-year filings, Roll Call has attempted to contact the offices to get a proper understanding of the actual value of the asset or assets in question.
What remains below is a ranking of the 50 wealthiest Members of Congress based on the minimum net worth reported on their financial disclosure forms. To achieve these numbers, Roll Call totaled the assets listed on financial disclosure forms filed in 2008 (covering calendar year 2007) using the lowest number in the ranges in which Members are required to report. An asset from $500,000 to $1 million is counted as being worth $500,000, unless the Member has provided a brokerage statement or other documentation that offers more specific detail.
Liabilities, which are also reported in ranges, are calculated based on the minimum value, and are subtracted from total minimum assets to establish total net worth.
Assets that are not included on the forms but have values that have been established by Roll Call or other publications are not included for the purposes of assembling this ranking, because the Members are not required to report these numbers. This ranking is based only on what is reported on the annual disclosure forms.
1. Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.)
$230.98 million
The Massachusetts Senator claims the mantel of richest Member in the 110th Congress. Kerrys actual holdings, however including those of wife Teresa Heinz Kerry, widow to ketchup heir Sen. John Heinz (R-Pa.) are likely much greater.
Stier: Detecting a Bad Breast Cancer Bill
July 1, 11:28 a.m.
Who could blame hundreds of Members of Congress for joining with a colleague and breast cancer survivor, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), in co-sponsoring legislation aimed at promoting breast cancer education? The problem, according to leading breast cancer scientists and advocacy groups, is the bill would do more harm than good. Read Full Article










